Purpose
By the end of this lesson, you will be able to apply a specific structure for giving effective, non-judgmental feedback in a coaching context.
Lesson Explanation
Effective coaching feedback follows a specific, learnable structure, genuinely different from vague praise or criticism:
1. Observation — state a specific, factual observation, not an interpretation: "You mentioned this goal three times, but haven't scheduled any time for it." 2. Impact — describe the observed effect, without assigning blame: "That gap between what you say matters and what's on your calendar seems worth exploring." 3. Invitation — open the floor back to the client, rather than concluding for them: "What do you make of that?"
This structure connects directly to Lesson 2’s coverage of leading questions: the feedback ends with an open invitation, not the coach’s own conclusion about what the gap means — the coach observes and reflects, but the client interprets.
A genuinely common mistake: skipping straight to interpretation (“You’re avoiding this because you’re scared”) instead of starting with a specific, factual observation. Interpretation stated as fact can feel presumptuous and shuts down the client’s own reflection, rather than opening it.
Practice Questions
1. What are the three steps of the feedback structure described in this lesson?
View Answer
Observation, Impact, Invitation.
2. What should an “observation” be based on, according to this lesson?
View Answer
A specific, factual observation, not an interpretation.
3. Give an example of a specific, factual observation, based on this lesson.
View Answer
Something like: “You mentioned this goal three times, but haven’t scheduled any time for it.”
4. What does the “impact” step describe?
View Answer
The observed effect, without assigning blame.
5. What does the “invitation” step do?
View Answer
Opens the floor back to the client, rather than concluding for them.
6. Give an example of an invitation-style closing question.
View Answer
Something like: “What do you make of that?”
7. How does this three-step structure connect to Lesson 2’s coverage of leading questions?
View Answer
The feedback ends with an open invitation, not the coach’s own conclusion — the coach observes and reflects, but the client interprets.
8. What is a genuinely common mistake in giving coaching feedback, according to this lesson?
View Answer
Skipping straight to interpretation instead of starting with a specific, factual observation.
9. Give an example of jumping straight to interpretation, which this lesson advises against.
View Answer
Something like: “You’re avoiding this because you’re scared.”
10. Why can stating an interpretation as fact feel presumptuous, according to this lesson?
View Answer
It shuts down the client’s own reflection, rather than opening it.
11. Which step comes first in this feedback structure: Observation, Impact, or Invitation?
View Answer
Observation.
12. Correct or incorrect: the “impact” step should assign blame for the observed gap.
View Answer
Incorrect — it should describe the effect without assigning blame.